by JD » Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:04 am
Ralph,
I don't know about Tomos' worldwide markets, but they sell a helluva lot of bikes in the Netherlands. They're all over Amsterdam. But that's a city that has more bicycles than cars, and has bike/moped lanes everywhere. Mopeds work in a compact, urban environment like that.
Ike, I know you’ve always maintained that a moped is a “toy,†and I agree that it is for much of their customer base in the U.S. The problem is that the motorized toy market is under serious attack by the Chinese scooters. Why would anyone pay $1,000 for a barebones Sprint when he can get a much better-equipped, faster, and slicker Chinese scooter for $700? The people who frequent this website understand the problems inherent in those cheap scooters, but most buyers don’t. The Sprint doesn’t stand a chance with the average toy buyer. Maybe your idea to have it made in China might work if they could knock $300-400 off the price that way.
It’s still a dead-end street, though. It doesn’t matter that Tomos has been making mopeds for 50 years. The market is changing.
There’s a much larger market opportunity at the $2,000 price point, and it’s currently populated by nothing but scooters. These are customers who live in college towns or compact, southern cities and who want something reliable and serviceable for regular transportation. (I’ve been in a lot of college towns lately, school shopping with my daughter, and I see lots and lots of scooters, not mopeds.) It’s not, and never will be, huge volume, but it’s a relatively stable market compared to motorized toys.
I agree that Tomos made a mistake by going after this market the way they are. They’re trying to sell a product that has no significant advantages over the existing products and they’re not marketing it very well, either. And I agree that they should probably ease out of it.
But where they COULD have a significant competitive advantage in the $2,000 market is with a proven product that really is DIFFERENT from all the scooters, and BETTER in most performance characteristics. They could take an existing product (probably the Streetmate) and stop positioning it as a moped, because it is, indeed, too expensive to operate in the “toy†market. But it would make a competitive scooter fighter, because neither Yamaha or Honda or any of the others have anything like it, at least not in this country. I doubt, however, that many scooter shoppers consider the Streetmate seriously (or even know about it, for that matter.) That could change with the right marketing and positioning.
Bottom line: Go after where the clients are, not where they were. Just ask Howard Johnson’s or Studebaker.
jd
...Operating with impunity in the legal gray area between bicycles and motorcycles....